Horton

Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect range in pg_regress comment

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>, Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-02-03T00:34:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 05:01:33PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh.  I see we did document it as 0-9 in [1], so I guess we're
> stuck with that now.  Objection withdrawn.

Oh.  I didn't know that 0 was accepted.  We learn new things every
day.

Right, let's adjust the comment to reflect what the docs say, as your
patch does.  I presume that Tom will do that..
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Fix incorrect range in pg_regress comment.