Thread

  1. Re: [PATCH] Optionally record Plan IDs to track plan changes for a query

    Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> — 2025-02-12T01:20:53Z

    On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 09:08:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
    > Wikipedia seems to agree with you that "fingerprint" would fit for
    > this purpose, though:
    > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingerprint_(computing)
    >
    > Has anybody any comments about that?  That would be a large renaming,
    > but in the long term is makes sense if we want to apply that to more
    > than just parse nodes and query strings.  If you do that, it impacts
    > the file names and the properties, that are hidden in the backend for
    > most of it, except the entry API and JumbleState.  This last part
    > impacts some extensions and I have been maintaining one a bit
    > (pg_hint_plan).
    
    I agree that fingerprint is a good improvement.
    
    >
    > Also adding Julien in CC,
    > as he has some out-of-core extension code that depends on the jumbling
    > structures if I recall correctly.
    
    I do have an extension to support custom fingerprinting logic, but the
    introduction of the pg_node_attr based jumbling kind of broke it.
    
    FTR my main motivation was to be able to deal with queries referencing
    temporary relations, as if your application creates a lot of those it basically
    means that you cannot use pg_stat_statements anymore.