Thread

Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> — 2025-02-14T09:57:01Z

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:36:48AM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Feb-14, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> 
> > Since the merging is a yes/no option (I think there used to be some discussions
> > about having a threshold or some other fancy modes), maybe you could instead
> > differentiate the merged version by have 2 constants rather than this "..." or
> > something like that?
> 
> Maybe the representation can be "($1 /*, ... */)" so that it's obvious
> that the array extends beyond the first element but is still
> syntactically valid.

Yeah that works too and it's probably way easier to implement.