Re: An improvement of ProcessTwoPhaseBuffer logic

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

To: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru>

Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2025-01-30T07:05:24Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Integrate FullTransactionIds deeper into two-phase code
- 62a17a92833d 19 (unreleased) landed
Merge copies of converting an XID to a FullTransactionId.
- 1587f7b9fc1a 17.3 landed
- 81772a495ec9 18.0 landed
Revert recent changes related to handling of 2PC files at recovery
- 4d6d7bdc0642 13.19 landed
- 060f9f5ea537 14.16 landed
- 42c900d31e57 15.11 landed
- 4d72357c40ee 16.7 landed
- d1bf86a62211 17.3 landed
- a6c70f68cdeb 18.0 landed
Fix failures with incorrect epoch handling for 2PC files at recovery
- c3de0f9eed38 17.3 landed
- 7e125b20eed6 18.0 landed

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 08:57:23AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So the situation is a bit of a mess in all the branches, a bit worse
> in 17~ due to the fact that epochs are poorly integrated, but I'm
> getting there with a set of patches mostly ready to be sent, and I
> think that this would be OK for a backpatch.  My plan is to start a
> new thread to deal with the matter, because that's a bit larger than
> the topic you have raised on this thread.  I'll add you and Noah in CC
> for awareness.

And done that here, with a closer lookup at everything I've bumped
into:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z5sd5O9JO7NYNK-C%40paquier.xyz
--
Michael