Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>

To: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>

Cc: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic.yhuel@dalibo.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2025-01-07T22:57:41Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

v3-0001-autovacuum_max_threshold.patch (text/plain)

Here is a rebased patch for cfbot.  AFAICT we are still pretty far from
consensus on which approach to take, unfortunately.

-- 
nathan

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Introduce autovacuum_vacuum_max_threshold.
- 306dc520b9df 18.0 landed
Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection
- ca9c6a5680d7 18.0 cited