Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-12-10T17:55:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add delay time to VACUUM/ANALYZE (VERBOSE) and autovacuum logs.
- 7720082ae532 18.0 landed
-
Add cost-based vacuum delay time to progress views.
- bb8dff9995f2 18.0 landed
-
Add is_analyze parameter to vacuum_delay_point().
- e5b0b0ce1509 18.0 landed
-
Refresh cost-based delay params more frequently in autovacuum
- 7d71d3dd080b 16.0 cited
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 04:41:03PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > + <structfield>time_delayed</structfield> <type>bigint</type> I think it's also worth considering names like total_delay and cumulative_delay. > + Total amount of time spent in milliseconds waiting during <xref linkend="guc-vacuum-cost-delay"/> > + or <xref linkend="guc-autovacuum-vacuum-cost-delay"/>. In case of parallel > + vacuum the reported time is across all the workers and the leader. The > + workers update the column no more frequently than once per second, so it > + could show slightly old values. I wonder if it makes sense to provide this value as an interval instead of the number of milliseconds to make it more human-readable. I might also suggest some changes to the description: Total accumulated time spent sleeping due to the cost-based vacuum delay settings (e.g., vacuum_cost_delay, vacuum_cost_limit). This includes the time that any associated parallel workers have slept, too. However, parallel workers report their sleep time no more frequently than once per second, so the reported value may be slightly stale. -- nathan