Re: Rework subscription-related code for psql and pg_dump
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-12-03T00:50:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 12:54:19PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > - if (strcmp(subinfo->subtwophasestate, two_phase_disabled) != 0) > + if (subinfo->subtwophasestate != LOGICALREP_TWOPHASE_STATE_DISABLED) > appendPQExpBufferStr(query, ", two_phase = on"); > > I'm not feeling strongly either way. The code intentionally wants to > set two_phase to "on" if the catalog state is "pending" or "on", so > sticking with the current assumption of the code and keeping it as > proposed in the patch is fine, IMO. I've looked at that again and let this as-is, then applied all this cleanup. -- Michael
Commits
-
Rework some code handling pg_subscription data in psql and pg_dump
- 08691ea958c2 18.0 landed