Re: Refactor backup related code (was: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?)
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, david@pgmasters.net, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2022-09-28T01:09:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:11:54PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 2:20 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi > <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: >> If this is still unacceptable, I propose to change the comment. (I >> found that the previous patch forgets about do_pg_backup_stop()) >> >> - * It fills in backup_state with the information required for the backup, >> + * It fills in the parameter "state" with the information required for the backup, > > +1. There's another place that uses backup_state in the comments. I > modified that as well. Please see the attached patch. Thanks, fixed the comments. I have let the variable names as they are now in the code, as both are backup-related code paths so it is IMO clear that the state is linked to a backup. -- Michael
Commits
-
Fix some comments of do_pg_backup_start() and do_pg_backup_stop()
- 2e560b974ec7 16.0 landed
-
Remove dependency to StringInfo in xlogbackup.{c.h}
- e1e6f8f3dfe1 16.0 landed
-
Refactor creation of backup_label and backup history files
- 7d708093b740 16.0 landed
-
Move basebackup code to new directory src/backend/backup
- a8c012869763 16.0 cited
-
Remove exclusive backup mode
- 39969e2a1e4d 15.0 cited