Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-08-26T00:51:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:45:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I'm leaning towards considering it a feature-change and thus not > something to backpatch (I'd be OK sneaking it into 15 though, as that > one is not released yet and it feels like a perfectly *safe* change). > Not enough to insist on it, but it seems "slightly more correct". Fine by me if both you and Daniel want to be more careful with this change. We could always argue about a backpatch later if there is more ask for it, as well. -- Michael
Commits
-
Handle SIGTERM in pg_receivewal and pg_recvlogical
- 8b60db774356 16.0 landed
-
doc: Add missing parenthesis to keycombo
- 6cbed0ec791f 16.0 landed
- 207fc7546644 15.0 landed