Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM

Re: Daniel Gustafsson
> Do you think pg_recvlogical should support SIGTERM as well?  (The signals which
> it does trap should be added to the documentation which just now says "until
> terminated by a signal" but that's a separate thing.)

Ack, that makes sense, added in the attached updated patch.

>  	pqsignal(SIGINT, sigint_handler);
> +	pqsignal(SIGTERM, sigint_handler);
> Tiny nitpick, I think we should rename sigint_handler to just sig_handler as it
> does handle more than sigint.

I went with sigexit_handler since pg_recvlogical has also a
sighup_handler and "sig_handler" would be confusing there.

Christoph