Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-07-18T20:09:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revert recent changes to 002_pg_upgrade.pl.
- 6f7e7d0c482d 15.0 landed
- 87e22f675fd8 16.0 landed
-
Revise test case added in 43746996399541ecb5c7b188725a5f097c15ceae.
- d92f2bc0dae3 15.0 landed
- 212bdc0cbc32 16.0 landed
-
Use TRUNCATE to preserve relfilenode for pg_largeobject + index.
- bbe08b8869bd 16.0 landed
- 4ab5dae9472c 15.0 landed
-
Preserve relfilenode of pg_largeobject and its index across pg_upgrade.
- a2996478c32d 15.0 landed
- d498e052b4b8 16.0 landed
-
Have VACUUM warn on relfrozenxid "in the future".
- e83ebfe6d767 15.0 cited
-
Set relfrozenxid to oldest extant XID seen by VACUUM.
- 0b018fabaaba 15.0 cited
-
pg_upgrade: Preserve relfilenodes and tablespace OIDs.
- 9a974cbcba00 15.0 cited
-
Perform a lot more sanity checks when freezing tuples.
- 699bf7d05c68 11.0 cited
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 02:57:40PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > So I tried implementing this but I didn't get it quite right the first > time. It's not enough to call smgrdounlinkall() instead of > RelationDropStorage(), because just as RelationDropStorage() does not > actually drop the storage but only schedules it to be dropped later, > so also smgrdounlinkall() does not in fact unlink all, but only some. > It leaves the first segment of the main relation fork around to guard > against the hazards discussed in the header comments for mdunlink(). > But those hazards don't really matter here either, because, again, any > failure will necessarily require that the entire new cluster be > destroyed, and also because there shouldn't be any concurrent activity > in the new cluster while pg_upgrade is running. So I adjusted > smgrdounlinkall() to actually remove everything when IsBinaryUpgrade = > true. And then it all seems to work: pg_upgrade of a cluster that has > had a rewrite of pg_largeobject works, and pg_upgrade of a cluster > that has not had such a rewrite works too. Wa-hoo. Using the IsBinaryUpgrade flag makes sense to me. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson