Horton

Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-07-15T03:44:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 03:59:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Please note that patch authors should not switch a patch as RfC by
> themselves.  This is something that a reviewer should do.

This patch has been marked as waiting for a review, however the CF bot
is completely red:
http://commitfest.cputube.org/simon-riggs.html

Could you take care of those issues first?
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Tweak a bit the new TAP tests of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM

  2. Rework logic and simplify syntax of REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM

  3. Add more tests for REINDEX DATABASE/SYSTEM with relfilenode changes