Thread

Commits

  1. Fix code comments still referring to pg_start/stop_backup()

  1. Comments referring to pg_start/stop_backup

    Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2022-06-28T04:41:58Z

    Hi all,
    
    While browsing through the recent changes with the base backup APIs, I
    have noticed that a couple of comments did not get the renaming of the
    SQL functions to pg_backup_start/stop, as of the attached.
    
    That's not a big deal, but let's be right.
    
    Thanks,
    --
    Michael
    
  2. Re: Comments referring to pg_start/stop_backup

    Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> — 2022-06-28T05:00:57Z

    At Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:41:58 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in 
    > Hi all,
    > 
    > While browsing through the recent changes with the base backup APIs, I
    > have noticed that a couple of comments did not get the renaming of the
    > SQL functions to pg_backup_start/stop, as of the attached.
    > 
    > That's not a big deal, but let's be right.
    
    +1 and I don't find other instances of the same mistake.
    
    regards.
    
    -- 
    Kyotaro Horiguchi
    NTT Open Source Software Center
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Comments referring to pg_start/stop_backup

    David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> — 2022-06-28T11:47:04Z

    On 6/28/22 01:00, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
    > At Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:41:58 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
    >> Hi all,
    >>
    >> While browsing through the recent changes with the base backup APIs, I
    >> have noticed that a couple of comments did not get the renaming of the
    >> SQL functions to pg_backup_start/stop, as of the attached.
    >>
    >> That's not a big deal, but let's be right.
    > 
    > +1 and I don't find other instances of the same mistake.
    
    Yes, these also look good to me. They are a bit tricky to search for so 
    I can see how we missed them.
    
    Regards,
    -David
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: Comments referring to pg_start/stop_backup

    Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2022-07-01T00:57:56Z

    On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 07:47:04AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
    > Yes, these also look good to me. They are a bit tricky to search for so I
    > can see how we missed them.
    
    Thanks for double-checking.  Applied.
    --
    Michael