Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2022-05-28T09:00:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 03:30:28PM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote: > Currently, lo_creat(e), lo_import, lo_unlink, lowrite, lo_put, > and lo_from_bytea are allowed even in read-only transactions. > By using them, pg_largeobject and pg_largeobject_metatable can > be modified in read-only transactions and the effect remains > after the transaction finished. Is it unacceptable behaviours, > isn't it? Well, there is an actual risk to break applications that have worked until now for a behavior that has existed for years with zero complaints on the matter, so I would leave that alone. Saying that, I don't really disagree with improving the error messages a bit if we are in recovery. -- Michael
Commits
-
Prevent write operations on large objects in read-only transactions
- 55f4802785f6 16.0 landed
-
Fix comment in regression tests for large objects
- 664da2a389e5 15.0 landed