Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

To: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>

Cc: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com" <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2021-12-22T07:40:16Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:57:32AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021, at 8:11 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> That's mostly fine.  I have made some adjustments as per the
>> attached.
>
> Your patch looks good to me.

Thanks.  I have done this part for now.
--
Michael

Commits

Correct comment and some documentation about REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX
- 9edca4cb57d2 10.20 landed
- 1a0ef5e2cc63 11.15 landed
- 861095a40987 12.10 landed
- 28e1e5c2a91c 13.6 landed
- 420f9ac1b77c 14.2 landed
- fc95d35b9429 15.0 landed
Add regression tests for REPLICA IDENTITY with dropped indexes
- fe7fd4e9613f 14.0 cited