Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

To: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com" <wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com>

Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2021-12-15T22:39:52Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:18:26AM +0000, wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Yeah, if we can add some details to pg-doc and code comments, I think it will
> be more friendly to PG users and developers.

Would you like to write a patch to address all that?
Thanks,
--
Michael

Commits

Correct comment and some documentation about REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX
- 9edca4cb57d2 10.20 landed
- 1a0ef5e2cc63 11.15 landed
- 861095a40987 12.10 landed
- 28e1e5c2a91c 13.6 landed
- 420f9ac1b77c 14.2 landed
- fc95d35b9429 15.0 landed
Add regression tests for REPLICA IDENTITY with dropped indexes
- fe7fd4e9613f 14.0 cited