Horton

Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-05-16T05:30:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 01:27:28AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> Here, I requested the rationale for the differences you had just described.
> You made a choice to stop testing one list of database names and start testing
> a different list of database names.  Why?

Because the shape of the new names does not change the test coverage
("regression" prefix or the addition of the double quotes with
backslashes for all the database names), while keeping the code a bit
simpler.  If you think that the older names are more adapted, I have
no objections to use them, FWIW, which is something like the patch
attached would achieve.

This uses the same convention as vcregress.pl before 322becb, but not
the one of test.sh where "regression" was appended to the database
names.
--
Michael

Commits

  1. Improve and fix some issues in the TAP tests of pg_upgrade

  2. Fix several issues with the TAP tests of pg_upgrade

  3. Make upgradecheck a no-op in MSVC's vcregress.pl

  4. Switch the regression tests of pg_upgrade to use TAP tests

  5. Fix check for PGHOST[ADDR] in pg_upgrade with Windows and temporary paths

  6. Remove REGRESS_OUTPUTDIR environment variable.

  7. Add PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::config_data()