Re: BUG #17485: Records missing from Primary Key index when doing REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Christophe Pettus <xof@thebuild.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, Петър Славов <pet.slavov@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-05-26T14:48:27Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 07:41:28AM -0700, Christophe Pettus wrote: > > > > On May 26, 2022, at 07:40, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > Uh, if people don't know if they have used CREATE/REINDEX CONCURRENTLY > > in PG 14.0+, they are going to need to run amcheck on all btree indexes > > and reindex all non-btree indexes? That is going to be a painful > > message to deliver, and hear. :-( > > Unless we are 100% sure that amcheck will never return a false negative in this situation, we may have to recommend reindexing everything. Ouch. I assume we are then looking at reindexdb, which has a parallel option. I assume we can also recommend --concurrently on a patched PG 14.4, which might not be terrible since it would not cause downtime. I guess the command would be: $ reindexdb --all --concurrently --jobs ## Without reindexdb's features, this would be much more painful. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
Commits
-
Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance
- e28bb8851969 15.0 landed
- 042b584c7f7d 14.4 landed
-
Fix possible HOT corruption when RECENTLY_DEAD changes to DEAD while pruning.
- 18b87b201f73 15.0 cited