Thread
Commits
-
doc: Add description for PGSSLCRLDIR
- 1e809db86b16 14.0 landed
-
doc: Fix link reference for PGSSLMAXPROTOCOLVERSION
- 6131cb144f84 13.4 landed
- 77e9d1b48842 14.0 landed
-
Documentation missing for PGSSLCRLDIR
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2021-06-03T03:13:22Z
Hi all, I have noticed that the documentation for PGSSLCRLDIR is missing. That seems like an oversight in f5465fa. Thoughts? -- Michael
-
Re: Documentation missing for PGSSLCRLDIR
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> — 2021-06-03T04:42:20Z
At Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:13:22 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in > Hi all, > > I have noticed that the documentation for PGSSLCRLDIR is missing. > That seems like an oversight in f5465fa. > > Thoughts? Ugg.. Thanks for finding that. I don't find a similar mistake in the same page. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
-
Re: Documentation missing for PGSSLCRLDIR
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> — 2021-06-03T12:08:02Z
> On 3 Jun 2021, at 05:13, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > I have noticed that the documentation for PGSSLCRLDIR is missing. > That seems like an oversight in f5465fa. +1 on applying this. While looking at this I found another nearby oversight which needs a backport down to 13 where it was introduced. The PGSSLMAXPROTOCOLVERSION documentation is linking to the minimum protocol version docs. Fixed in the attached. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
-
Re: Documentation missing for PGSSLCRLDIR
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2021-06-04T00:45:47Z
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 02:08:02PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > While looking at this I found another nearby oversight which needs a backport > down to 13 where it was introduced. The PGSSLMAXPROTOCOLVERSION documentation > is linking to the minimum protocol version docs. Fixed in the attached. Thanks, fixed this bit. -- Michael
-
Re: Documentation missing for PGSSLCRLDIR
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2021-06-04T00:50:28Z
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:42:20PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > Ugg.. Thanks for finding that. I don't find a similar mistake in the > same page. Thanks for double-checking. Applied. -- Michael