Re: hba.c:3160:18: warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-04-07T11:57:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- gcc-hba-warning.patch (text/x-diff) patch
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 01:24:01PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:01 PM Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Recently (last day or so), I get this warning from gcc 10.2: Same compiler version here, but I did not get warned. Are you using any particular flag? > But that also highlights -- shouldn't that function then also be made > to use hba_authname(), and the assert moved into the function? That > seems like the cleanest way? Good idea, that's much cleaner this way. Do you like the attached? -- Michael
Commits
-
Refactor hba_authname
- c1968426ba3d 14.0 landed
-
Add some information about authenticated identity via log_connections
- 9afffcb833d3 14.0 cited