Horton

Re: Inaccuracy in wal_receiver_status_interval parameter description

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Dmitriy Kuzmin <kuzmin.db4@gmail.com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-02-25T02:41:47Z
Lists: pgsql-docs 
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:16:57PM +1000, Dmitriy Kuzmin wrote:
> Will this change be made in the documentation for all Postgresql versions?

This wording has been introduced back in 2011 as of b186523, and
nobody complained about that until now, so I did not see a strong need
to back-patch it.  Would people prefer a back-patch for that?
--
Michael

Commits

  1. doc: Improve description of wal_receiver_status_interval