Re: Improvements and additions to COPY progress reporting
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Josef Šimánek <josef.simanek@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Date: 2021-02-24T07:46:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:27:24AM +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote: > Note, I'm happy to be proven wrong here, in which case I don't > disagree, but according to my limited knowledge, these outputs should > be stable. I am planning to look more at 0001 and 0003, but for now I have been looking at 0002 which is interesting on its own. + <structname>pg_stat_progress_vacuum</structname> view. Backends running + <command>VACUUM</command> with the <literal>FULL</literal> option report + progress in the <structname>pg_stat_progress_cluster</structname> instead. You have missed one "view" after pg_stat_progress_cluster here. Except that, this stuff looks fine. So I'd like to apply it if there are no objections. -- Michael
Commits
-
Add some basic tests for progress reporting of COPY
- 15639d5e8f6f 14.0 landed
-
Add support for more progress reporting in COPY
- 9d2d45700928 14.0 landed
-
doc: Add backlinks to progress reporting documentation
- 8a8f4d8ede28 14.0 landed