Re: Report roles in pg_upgrade pg_ prefix check
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-11-28T01:18:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 12:31:09PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > Looking at a recent pg_upgrade thread I happened to notice that the check for > roles with a pg_ prefix only reports the error, not the roles it found. Other > similar checks where the user is expected to alter the old cluster typically > reports the found objects in a textfile. The attached adds reporting to make > that class of checks consistent (the check for prepared transactions which also > isn't reporting is different IMO as it doesn't expect ALTER commands). > > As this check is only executed against the old cluster the patch removes the > check when printing the error. +1. A backpatch would be nice, though not strictly mandatory as that's not a bug fix. + ntups = PQntuples(res); + i_rolname = PQfnumber(res, "rolname"); Would it be worth adding the OID on top of the role name in the generated report? That would be a free meal. -- Michael
Commits
-
Report incompatible roles in pg_upgrade checking
- c76da690ba14 16.0 landed