Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-02-09T00:07:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:30:32AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > In the last 30 days, only the following buildfarm animals have reported > running the ssl checks on the relevant branches: > > gokiburi > hachi FWIW, these two ones are using OpenSSL 1.1.1, so that's fine. -- Michael
Commits
-
Backpatch OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests
- 6133a0f4c7c3 12.15 landed
- cab553a08e2d 11.20 landed
-
OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests
- f0d2c65f17ca 13.0 cited
-
Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
- 7b283d0e1d1d 13.0 cited