Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 11:01:03PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Given that we already pay the price of multiple regress runs, and that
> jumbling is now really a core feature, perhaps we should enable
> pg_stat_statements in pg_upgrade or 027_stream_regress.pl? I'd hope it
> wouldn't add a meaningful amount of time?  A tiny bit of verification at the
> end should also be ok.

Yeah, I have briefly mentioned this part upthread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Y8+BdCOjxykre5es@paquier.xyz

It would not, I guess, as long as pg_stat_statements.max is set large 
enough in the TAP test.  There are currently 21k~22k entries in the
regression database, much larger than the default of 5000 so this may
become an issue on small-ish machines if left untouched even in a TAP
test.

> Both pg_upgrade and 027_stream_regress.pl have some advantages. The former
> would test pg_upgrade interactions with shared_preload_libraries, the latter
> could do some basic checks of pg_stat_statements on a standby.

Yes, there could be more checks, potentially useful for both cases, so
I may choose both at the end of the day.  Checking the consistency of
the contents of pg_stat_statements across a pg_upgrade run for the
same version may be one thing?  I am not sure if it is that
interesting, TBH, still that's one idea :)
--
Michael