Re: ISO 8601 'Time Intervals' of the 'format with time-unit deignators'

Randolf Richardson <rr@8x.ca>

From: Randolf Richardson <rr@8x.ca>
To: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-12-03T10:20:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
[sNip]
> ISO 8601 gives more specific names.
> 
>   ISO 8601 Basic Format:         P2Y10M15DT10H20M30S
>   ISO 8601 Alternative Format:   P00021015T102030
>   ISO 8601 Extended Format:      P0002-10-15T10:20:30
> 
> In a way, the Extended Format is kinda nice, since its
> almost human readable.
> 
> I could put in both the basic and extended ones, and
> call the dateformats iso8601basic and iso8601extended.
> The negative is that to do iso8601basic right, Id also
> have to tweak the date and time parts of the code too.

    	Perhaps all three formats should be supported, and if the following 
names were all valid things could be simplified further too:

    	    	iso8601basic
    	    	iso8601bas
    	    	iso8601alternative
    	    	iso8601alt
    	    	iso8601extended
    	    	iso8601ext

    	The reason for allowing shorter names is to simplify database 
management for anyone who may need to store the format name in a column for 
some reason (I can't think of one now, but I get a feeling that someone 
will want to do this type of thing in the future).

    	For that matter, the first letter could be used instead of the first 
three for the short versions.  Any thoughts on this?

-- 
Randolf Richardson - rr@8x.ca
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Please do not eMail me directly when responding
to my postings in the newsgroups.