Re: CHECK Constraint Deferrable
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya.himanshu@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-10-03T00:06:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
På fredag 07. juli 2023 kl. 13:50:44, skrev Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com <mailto:dilipbalaut@gmail.com>>: On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 3:08 PM Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya.himanshu@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently, there is no support for CHECK constraint DEFERRABLE in a create table statement. > SQL standard specifies that CHECK constraint can be defined as DEFERRABLE. I think this is a valid argument that this is part of SQL standard so it would be good addition to PostgreSQL. So +1 for the feature. But I am wondering whether there are some real-world use cases for deferred CHECK/NOT NULL constraints? I mean like for foreign key constraints if there is a cyclic dependency between two tables then deferring the constraint is the simplest way to insert without error. The real-world use case, at least for me, is when using an ORM. For large object-graphs ORMs have a tendency to INSERT first with NULLs then UPDATE the “NOT NULLs” later. “Rewrite the ORM” is not an option for most of us… -- Andreas Joseph Krogh