Horton

Re: Daterange question

Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>, pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-01-20T06:10:49Z
Lists: pgsql-general 

På lørdag 20. januar 2024 kl. 06:35:07, skrev Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us 
<mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>>:
[…]
Well, we can definitively state that the NOT makes this unindexable.
You need a WHERE clause that looks like
indexed-column indexable-operator pseudo-constant
which this isn't, nor does << have a negator operator that could
allow the NOT to be simplified out.

Wouldn't
drange && daterange(CURRENT_DATE, NULL, '[)')
serve the purpose? That should be indexable.

regards, tom lane
Yes it will, thanks.






--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andreas@visena.com <mailto:andreas@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
 <https://www.visena.com>