RE: Skipping schema changes in publication
Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu) <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>
From: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>
To: 'vignesh C' <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-05-19T01:58:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix miscellaneous issues in EXCEPT publication clause.
- 6b0550c45d13 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Change syntax of EXCEPT TABLE clause in publication commands.
- 5984ea868eee 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add support for EXCEPT TABLE in ALTER PUBLICATION.
- 493f8c6439cf 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow table exclusions in publications via EXCEPT TABLE.
- fd366065e06a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests.
- 0c20dd33db16 16.0 cited
On Thursday, May 19, 2022 2:45 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 8:32 AM osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com > <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > (3) src/test/regress/expected/publication.out > > > > +-- Verify that only superuser can reset a publication ALTER > > +PUBLICATION testpub_reset OWNER TO regress_publication_user2; SET > > +ROLE regress_publication_user2; ALTER PUBLICATION testpub_reset > > +RESET; -- fail > > > > > > We have "-- fail" for one case in this patch. > > On the other hand, isn't better to add "-- ok" (or "-- success") for > > other successful statements, when we consider the entire tests > > description consistency ? > > We generally do not mention success comments for all the success cases as > that might be an overkill. I felt it is better to keep it as it is. > Thoughts? Thank you for updating the patches ! In terms of this point, I meant to say we add "-- ok" for each successful "ALTER PUBLICATION testpub_reset RESET;" statement. That means, we'll have just three places to add "--ok" and I thought this was not an overkill. *But*, I'm also OK with your idea. Please don't change the comments and keep them as it is like v6. Best Regards, Takamichi Osumi