RE: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
Dear Nisha,
>
> Attached v51 patch-set addressing all comments in [1] and [2].
>
Thanks for working on the feature! I've stated to review the patch.
Here are my comments - sorry if there are something which have already been discussed.
The thread is too long to follow correctly.
Comments for 0001
=============
01. binary_upgrade_logical_slot_has_caught_up
ISTM that error_if_invalid is set to true when the slot can be moved forward, otherwise
it is set to false. Regarding the binary_upgrade_logical_slot_has_caught_up, however,
only valid slots will be passed to the funciton (see pg_upgrade/info.c) so I feel
it is OK to set to true. Thought?
02. ReplicationSlotAcquire
According to other functions, we are adding to a note to the translator when
parameters represent some common nouns, GUC names. I feel we should add a comment
for RS_INVAL_WAL_LEVEL part based on it.
Comments for 0002
=============
03. check_replication_slot_inactive_timeout
Can we overwrite replication_slot_inactive_timeout to zero when pg_uprade (and also
pg_createsubscriber?) starts a server process? Several parameters have already been
specified via -c option at that time. This can avoid an error while the upgrading.
Note that this part is still needed even if you accept the comment. Users can
manually boot with upgrade mode.
04. ReplicationSlotAcquire
Same comment as 02.
05. ReportSlotInvalidation
Same comment as 02.
06. found bug
While testing the patch, I found that slots can be invalidated too early when when
the GUC is quite large. I think because an overflow is caused in InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot().
- Reproducer
I set the replication_slot_inactive_timeout to INT_MAX and executed below commands,
and found that the slot is invalidated.
```
postgres=# SHOW replication_slot_inactive_timeout;
replication_slot_inactive_timeout
-----------------------------------
2147483647s
(1 row)
postgres=# SELECT * FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('test', 'test_decoding');
slot_name | lsn
-----------+-----------
test | 0/18B7F38
(1 row)
postgres=# CHECKPOINT ;
CHECKPOINT
postgres=# SELECT slot_name, inactive_since, invalidation_reason FROM pg_replication_slots ;
slot_name | inactive_since | invalidation_reason
-----------+-------------------------------+---------------------
test | 2024-11-28 07:50:25.927594+00 | inactive_timeout
(1 row)
```
- analysis
In InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot(), replication_slot_inactive_timeout_sec * 1000
is passed to the third argument of TimestampDifferenceExceeds(), which is also the
integer datatype. This causes an overflow and parameter is handled as the small
value.
- solution
I think there are two possible solutions. You can choose one of them:
a. Make the maximum INT_MAX/1000, or
b. Change the unit to millisecond.
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED