RE: Is this a problem in GenericXLogFinish()?
Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
To: 'Alexander Lakhin' <exclusion@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-11-30T03:09:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dear Alexander, > > I've discovered that that patch introduced a code path leading to an > uninitialized memory access. > With the following addition to hash_index.sql: > -- Fill overflow pages by "dead" tuples. > BEGIN; > INSERT INTO hash_cleanup_heap SELECT 1 FROM generate_series(1, 1000) > as i; > +INSERT INTO hash_cleanup_heap SELECT 1 FROM generate_series(1, 1000) as > i; > ROLLBACK; > +INSERT INTO hash_cleanup_heap SELECT 1 FROM generate_series(1, 1000) as > i; > > make check -C src/test/recovery/ PROVE_TESTS="t/027*" > when executed under Valgrind, triggers: > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised > value(s) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== at 0x227585: BufferIsValid (bufmgr.h:303) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x227585: hash_xlog_squeeze_page > (hash_xlog.c:781) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x228133: hash_redo (hash_xlog.c:1083) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x2C2801: ApplyWalRecord > (xlogrecovery.c:1943) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x2C5C52: PerformWalRecovery > (xlogrecovery.c:1774) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x2B63A1: StartupXLOG (xlog.c:5559) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x558165: StartupProcessMain > (startup.c:282) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x54DFE8: AuxiliaryProcessMain > (auxprocess.c:141) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x5546B0: StartChildProcess > (postmaster.c:5331) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x557A53: PostmasterMain > (postmaster.c:1458) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== by 0x4720C2: main (main.c:198) > ==00:00:02:30.285 97744== > (in 027_stream_regress_standby_1.log) > > That is, when line > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/access/hash/hash_xlog.c.gcov.ht > ml#661 > is reached, writebuf stays uninitialized. Good catch, thank you for reporting! I will investigate more about it and post my analysis. Best Regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
Commits
-
Fix inconsistency with replay of hash squeeze record for clean buffers
- f56a9def71bb 17.0 landed
-
Set LSN for wbuf in _hash_freeovflpage() iff wbuf is modified.
- aa5edbe379d6 17.0 landed
-
Fix an uninitialized access in hash_xlog_squeeze_page().
- f66fcc5cd616 17.0 landed
-
Use REGBUF_NO_CHANGE at one more place in the hash index.
- 861f86beea1c 17.0 landed
-
Assert that buffers are marked dirty before XLogRegisterBuffer().
- 00d7fb5e2e39 17.0 landed
-
Fix bug in GenericXLogFinish().
- 04f0baa85865 11.22 landed
- 6dbd01b9fdad 12.17 landed
- 469d367bee2f 13.13 landed
- 6615bb95af2d 14.10 landed
- b9bb02620d4b 15.5 landed
- b8963e8a2854 16.1 landed
- ef74c7197c04 17.0 landed
-
Improve hash index bucket split behavior.
- 6d46f4783efe 10.0 cited