RE: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side

Hi, 

Thank you for developing good features.
The attached patch is a small fix to the committed documentation. This patch fixes the description literal for the backup_streamed column.

Regards,
Noriyoshi Shinoda

-----Original Message-----
From: Fujii Masao [mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 12:09 PM
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: amitlangote09@gmail.com; masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side



On 2020/03/03 9:27, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Mon, 2 Mar 2020 17:29:30 +0900, Fujii Masao 
> <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in
>>> Attached is the updated version of the patch.
>>> The previous patch used only pgstat_progress_update_param() even 
>>> when updating multiple values. Since those updates are not atomic, 
>>> this can cause readers of the values to see the intermediate states. 
>>> To avoid this issue, the latest patch uses 
>>> pgstat_progress_update_multi_param(), instead.
>>
>> Attached the updated version of the patch.
>> Barring any objections, I plan to commit this patch.
> 
> It is working as designed and the status names are fine to me.

Thanks for the review! I pushed the patch.

> The last one comment from me.
> The newly defined symbols have inconsistent indents.

Yes, I fixed that.

Regards,


--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters