Re: [HACKERS] Patch for glibc2 date problems
Maarten Boekhold <maartenb@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl>
From: Maarten Boekhold <maartenb@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl>
To: "Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 1998-01-16T09:52:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote: > > The patch for glibc2 dates is attached. With this applied, a Linux system > > with libc6 (glibc2) passes all the date and time related regression tests. > It looks as though this patch is a bit Linux-specific (or specific to some version of glibc which has only been tested on Linux). > Can we wait until glibc2 settles down, or provide this as an add-on patch rather than merging it into the main tree? I hate adding machine-specific code into otherwise general code... > Another possibility would be to add a new #define variable like HAVE_FUNNY_LIBRARY in config.h or in linux.h so we can possibly use this with other ports if necessary in the future. How about making this #define 'HAVE_GLIBC' ??? Maarten _____________________________________________________________________________ | Maarten Boekhold, Faculty of Electrical Engineering TU Delft, NL | | Computer Architecture and Digital Technique section | | M.Boekhold@et.tudelft.nl | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------