Re: [GENERAL] Optimizations for busy DB??
Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
From: Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
To: Brian <signal@shreve.net>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-05-13T19:43:26Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Brian wrote: One obvious thing might be to try to avoid having so many things hitting the database. I've found that often when people have that many connections in use, there's a better way to do it. This may not be the case for you since I don't know your application, but the best database optimizations I've put into place were in the application, having it avoid hitting the database. # # We are running a Database that is having between 100-500 simultaneous # accesses at any given time. Are their any flags, switches or # optimizations on the postgres level that can be done? such as options # passed to postgres etc? We run 6.3.2, and start it like: # # su postgres -c '/usr/bin/postmaster -i -S -D/var/lib/pgsql # # Thanks for any help. # # Brian # # # ----------------------------------------------------- # Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net # 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal # Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) # # # -- SA, beyond.com My girlfriend asked me which one I like better. pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net> | Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________