Thread
-
Status of 6.3.2 snapshot on alpha/Digital Unix
Pedro J. Lobo <pjlobo@euitt.upm.es> — 1998-04-16T14:58:49Z
Hi, all. I've just compiled the latest 6.3.2 snapshot on Digital Unix 3.2g using DEC's C compiler. The regression tests look good, so go ahead with the release (at least for this platform). However, there are two minor "errors". One of them is already known: configure fails when --with-compiler is specified. Included is a patch to the configure script. I know that this is not the right file to patch, since it is generated from configure.in, but we can use it as a workaround since the error lies in autoconf. The patch should be re-applied every time autoconf is run. The second "error" is a new one. The configure script no longer asks for additional include and lib directories, so, for example, it doesn't find my readline libs, installed under /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib. Since these are two common directories to have additional software installed into, I have added them to src/templates/alpha. Attached is a patch to make this change. It won't hurt even if the directories don't exist. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedro José Lobo Perea Tel: +34 1 336 78 19 Centro de Cálculo Fax: +34 1 331 92 29 EUIT Telecomunicación - UPM e-mail: pjlobo@euitt.upm.es
-
Re: [HACKERS] Status of 6.3.2 snapshot on alpha/Digital Unix
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> — 1998-04-16T15:18:35Z
> The second "error" is a new one. The configure script no longer asks for > additional include and lib directories, so, for example, it doesn't find > my readline libs, installed under /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib. > Since these are two common directories to have additional software > installed into, I have added them to src/templates/alpha. Attached is a > patch to make this change. It won't hurt even if the directories don't > exist. > We have new -with-includes -with-libraries options. -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
-
Re: [HACKERS] Status of 6.3.2 snapshot on alpha/Digital Unix
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-04-16T16:05:59Z
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Pedro J. Lobo wrote: > Hi, all. > > I've just compiled the latest 6.3.2 snapshot on Digital Unix 3.2g using > DEC's C compiler. The regression tests look good, so go ahead with the > release (at least for this platform). > > However, there are two minor "errors". One of them is already known: > configure fails when --with-compiler is specified. Included is a patch to > the configure script. I know that this is not the right file to patch, > since it is generated from configure.in, but we can use it as a workaround > since the error lies in autoconf. The patch should be re-applied every > time autoconf is run. Any idea if a patch is possible for autoconf itself? > The second "error" is a new one. The configure script no longer asks for > additional include and lib directories, so, for example, it doesn't find > my readline libs, installed under /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib. > Since these are two common directories to have additional software > installed into, I have added them to src/templates/alpha. Attached is a > patch to make this change. It won't hurt even if the directories don't > exist. ./configure --help should list both a '--with-includes=' and '--with-libraries=' option :)
-
Re: [HACKERS] Status of 6.3.2 snapshot on alpha/Digital Unix
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-04-17T01:25:14Z
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Pedro J. Lobo wrote: > However, there are two minor "errors". One of them is already known: > configure fails when --with-compiler is specified. Included is a patch to > the configure script. I know that this is not the right file to patch, > since it is generated from configure.in, but we can use it as a workaround > since the error lies in autoconf. The patch should be re-applied every > time autoconf is run. I was just thinking about it, and wasn't the solution under Solaris to actually define CC=cc in that OSs template file..?? Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org