Horton

Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects

Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>

View thread
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2002-01-30T20:08:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> Bill Studenmund wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > SQL99 doesn't have tables in there
> > AFAICT, but I think it makes sense.
>
> It seems to make sense but they are different and
> our *path* is never an extension of SQL-path.
> Where are the difference or the relevance referred
> to in this thread ?

How is our path not an extention of SQL-path? Or at least how is the path
I've been pushing not an SQL-path?

Take care,

Bill