Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
From: Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-02T06:55:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Isn't inheritance kinda one of those things that is required in order to
> be consider ourselves ORBDMS, which we do classify our selves as being?
Well, it depends on what you call an ORDBMS. By the standards of
Date and Darwen in _The Third Manifesto_, table inheritance is not
required and is in fact discouraged as a feature trivially implemented
with views, foreign keys and constraints. (Though that does not
mean that posgresql currently has an implementation of these that
will make it trivial.)
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC