Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?

Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>

From: Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-02T06:55:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> Isn't inheritance kinda one of those things that is required in order to
> be consider ourselves ORBDMS, which we do classify our selves as being?

Well, it depends on what you call an ORDBMS. By the standards of
Date and Darwen in _The Third Manifesto_, table inheritance is not
required and is in fact discouraged as a feature trivially implemented
with views, foreign keys and constraints. (Though that does not
mean that posgresql currently has an implementation of these that
will make it trivial.)

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org
    Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light.  --XTC