Re: [HACKERS] database size

Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Darren King <darrenk@insightdist.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, sthomas@cise.ufl.edu
Date: 1998-01-07T00:32:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Darren King wrote:

> 48 bytes + each row header (on my aix box..._your_ mileage may vary)
>  8 bytes + two int fields @ 4 bytes each
>  4 bytes + pointer on page to tuple
> -------- =
> 60 bytes per tuple
> 
> 8192 / 60 give 136 tuples per page.
> 
> 300000 / 136 ... round up ... need 2206 pages which gives us ...
> 
> 2206 * 8192 = 18,071,532
> 
> So 19 MB is about right.  And this is the best to be done, unless
> you can make do with int2s which would optimally shrink the table
> size to 16,834,560 bytes.  Any nulls in there might add a few bytes
> per offending row too, but other than that, this should be considered
> normal postgresql behavior.

	Bruce...this would be *great* to have in the FAQ!!  What we do need is
a section of the User Manual dealing with computing resources required for
a table, similar to this :)

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org