Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu>, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-03-23T16:49:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > This seems to defeat the purpose of the configure script. Isn't it > > supposed to find whatever is needed, whereever it is, and let the rest > > of the software do the right thing? > > > > In that case, it seems to me that configure should be checking all the > > relevant version-specific locations without requiring any prompts. > > After a few iterations, the list of appropriate directories will be > > more-or-less all inclusive, so all will be well. The --use-tcl or > > whatever config option can also give an explicit location in case the > > current ones are not appropriate. > > > > But removing the other directories and requiring either a special > > installation or response to a prompt seems to go against the nature > > (and usefulness) of the configure system. > > It seems tcl/tk uses directory names with version numbers, and I have > no intention of searching for every version they have ever released. Why not? Or, rather, why not just do the ones that get reported to us? It does hurt to, and I think it hurts more not too...