Re: [HACKERS] attlen weirdness?
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: "Julia A.Case" <julie@hub.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org, julie@MageNet.com
Date: 1998-03-11T13:11:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce? Guys? Any word on this one? I *thought* I remembered reading soething about the 'attlen' becoming -1, but just checked the mailing list archives and couldn't find anything :( Thanks... On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Julia A.Case wrote: > I am using the following info to migrate a table from 6.2.1 to 6.3 > > \connect template1 > drop database magecal; > create database magecal; > \connect magecal > \connect - julie > CREATE TABLE dates (id int4, date char(10), news char(1024)) archive = none; > COPY dates FROM stdin; > 1 1998Jan16 <H3>Calendar Created</H3> ! > ! > ! > > \. > CREATE INDEX dates_indx on dates using btree ( id int4_ops, date bpchar_ops ); > > > now if I connect to the database and do > > select attlen from pg_attribute where attname='news'; > > I get > -1 > > This doesn't seem quite right. > > Julie > > -- > [ Julia Anne Case ] [ Ships are safe inside the harbor, ] > [Programmer at large] [ but is that what ships are really for. ] > [ Admining Linux ] [ To thine own self be true. ] > [ Windows/WindowsNT ] [ Fair is where you take your cows to be judged. ] >