Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: jwieck@debis.com, Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 1998-02-19T20:04:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same > > > > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place? It sounds to me like we are > > > > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it... > > > > > > > > > > grant/revoke works for copy. > > > > > > > > Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the > > > > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine? > > > > > > Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested? > > > > Don't think so - not really hard tested. > > If you think you can get it in with light testing by the beta people, > Marc might bite on it. There is nothing wrong with doing what we did last time...we have, what, 7 post-release patches for v6.2.1?