Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)

Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: jwieck@debis.com, Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 1998-02-19T20:04:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > 	Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> > > > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place?  It sounds to me like we are
> > > > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
> > > > > 
> > > > > grant/revoke works for copy.
> > > > 
> > > > 	Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
> > > > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine?
> > > 
> > > Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested?
> > 
> >     Don't think so - not really hard tested.
> 
> If you think you can get it in with light testing by the beta people,
> Marc might bite on it.

	There is nothing wrong with doing what we did last time...we have,
what, 7 post-release patches for v6.2.1?