Re: [HACKERS] configure on linux
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Tom I Helbekkmo <tih@Hamartun.Priv.NO>
Cc: Goran Thyni <goran@bildbasen.se>, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-02-04T13:14:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 4 Feb 1998, Tom I Helbekkmo wrote: > Actually, it would be good to get all tas() assembly implementations > out of include/storage/s_lock.h and into genuine .s files like this. > With the current way of doing it, the assembly routine has to be > "static", because s_lock.h is included several places, which is a bit > silly, but a worse consequence is that GCC will inline the assembly > code at optimization levels above 2, thus breaking it.. Is this what > you're doing, and the reason why the above problem occurred? Actually, the problem seems to be configure not quite doing things as I expect :( > Is it too late to get the VAX stuff into 6.3? It's really not much, > and it would be kinda fun... :-) Ssend in the patch, we'll look it over. If it doesn't go into v6.3, then we'll have the patch online for v6.4 :)