Thread

1. *Major* Patch for PL

   Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-01-15T19:44:20Z

   Hi...
   
   	I've just installed (massaged in?) a major major patch for PL(?)
   that was submitted in Nov...snapshot will be created in about 18hrs or
   so...please test and report back any problems...haven't had a chance to
   test compile it here yet :(
   
   
   
   
   

2. Re: [HACKERS] *Major* Patch for PL

   Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com> — 1998-01-19T11:12:11Z

   > Hi...
   >
   >    I've just installed (massaged in?) a major major patch for PL(?)
   > that was submitted in Nov...snapshot will be created in about 18hrs or
   > so...please test and report back any problems...haven't had a chance to
   > test compile it here yet :(
   
       Waited  for that so long - thanks. I'll take a look at it and
       run my tests asap.
   
   
   Until later, Jan
   
   --
   
   #======================================================================#
   # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
   # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
   #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
   
   
   
   

3. Re: [HACKERS] *Major* Patch for PL

   Jan Wieck <jwieck@debis.com> — 1998-01-19T13:18:01Z

   >
   > > Hi...
   > >
   > >    I've just installed (massaged in?) a major major patch for PL(?)
   > > that was submitted in Nov...snapshot will be created in about 18hrs or
   > > so...please test and report back any problems...haven't had a chance to
   > > test compile it here yet :(
   >
   >     Waited  for that so long - thanks. I'll take a look at it and
   >     run my tests asap.
   >
   
       Looks O.K. - tests passed through.
   
       Now  anything  is  prepared  for  PL  support  in  all places
       (aggregates, operators, etc.). At least  PL/Tcl  ran  in  all
       that areas.
   
       Found  a  little  bug in interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c during
       tests. In line 403 conn->pgpass is set to DefaultPassword and
       later  in  line  665  this might be free()'d. Just wrapping a
       strdup() around DefaultPassword fixed it.
   
       Did anybody worked on other languages for  PL  modules  since
       this  new interface was designed? Who would like to dive into
       (perl/phyton/...)? Who  would  like  to  co-work  on  a  pure
       PL/pgSQL?
   
   
   Until later, Jan
   
   --
   
   #======================================================================#
   # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
   # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
   #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #