Horton

Re: [HACKERS] HAVING clause and 6.3.2 release

Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>

View thread
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: "Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers@postgresql.org>, ssimkovi@rainbow.studorg.tuwien.ac.at
Date: 1998-04-16T13:53:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:

> > > My question is, "Do we disable the HAVING clause for 6.3.2?"  The
> > > bugs are serious and cause crashes.
> > > Do we disable it?
> > Yes...but disabling means that it *will not* be available until
> > v6.4...no v6.3.3 :)
> 
> Hmm. What is the downside to leaving it in with caveats or "stay away"
> warnings in the release notes? Since it didn't exist as a feature
> before, the only downside I see is somewhat increased traffic on the
> questions list...

	I liked the one suggestion about having it as a compile time
option until its fixed...