Thread

  1. My problems...

    Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-04-15T16:08:46Z

    Oh whoa is me...is that how you spell whoa in this case? *raised eyebrow*
    
    Oh well, irrelevant...did some deeper looking inot my local problem, and
    it turns out I had a postgres process that was just growing and growing.
    I'm suspecting that that is what caused the problem :(
    
    I've changed the code so that instead of holding the postgres process open
    for the duration of the process (radiusd), just open/close it as required,
    to see if it gets rid of the problem...
    
    I should know sometime tomorrow whether this cures it or not ... so, if
    nobody else has any really big outstanding issues, Friday targetting for
    v6.3.2 to go out?
    
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: [HACKERS] My problems...

    Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih+mail@hamartun.priv.no> — 1998-04-15T17:43:59Z

    The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
    
    > Oh whoa is me...is that how you spell whoa in this case? *raised eyebrow*
    
    The proper exclamation is "Woe is me!".
    
    We now return you to your regularly scheduled program...  :-)
    
    -tih
    -- 
    Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity.  --Niles Crane, "Frasier"
    
    
  3. Re: [HACKERS] My problems...

    Peter T Mount <psqlhack@maidast.demon.co.uk> — 1998-04-15T18:16:05Z

    On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
    
    > I should know sometime tomorrow whether this cures it or not ... so, if
    > nobody else has any really big outstanding issues, Friday targetting for
    > v6.3.2 to go out?
    
    I have another JDBC patch which I'm finishing off tonight.
    
    -- 
    Peter T Mount  petermount@earthling.net or pmount@maidast.demon.co.uk
    Main Homepage: http://www.demon.co.uk/finder
    Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk
    
    
    
  4. Re: [HACKERS] My problems...

    Thomas Good <tomg@nrnet.org> — 1998-04-15T18:30:50Z

    Marc - sorry to bother you - but: were any changes made to ecpg1.1
    in the forthcoming 6.3.2?
    
    I'm asking as, other than some odd behaviour with calls to gets(),
    ecpg on 6.3 ran fine but although 6.3.1 compiled w/out complaint,
    tests went fine, etc, ecpg failed to preprocess.  I would get a
    seg-fault and a zero'd out .c file...I was able to replicate this
    on a 2nd box.  :-(
    
    I cannot articulate why ecpg is misbehaving, only that I am hoping
    for a fix!  It is my principal interface...
    
    Thanks alot,
    Tom Good
    
        ----------- Sisters of Charity Medical Center ----------
                        Department of Psychiatry
                                  ----     
     Thomas Good, System Administrator            <tomg@q8.nrnet.org>
     North Richmond CMHC/Residential Services     Phone: 718-354-5528
     75 Vanderbilt Ave, Quarters 8                Fax:   718-354-5056
     Staten Island, NY   10305