Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Autocomplete <TAB> on Postgres7.4beta5 not

scott.marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>, Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>, Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>, <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>
Date: 2003-10-29T00:34:47Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a 
> > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
> 
> Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?

Me, hardly ever use them  :-)  So I can assume that removing the implicit 
pg_catalog from the search path is a "bad thing."

In that case, does my proposed solution of having to implicitly include 
pg_catalog in your search path to get it to be seen by tab completion as 
just another schema make sense?