Re: 7.4?
scott.marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
From: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
To: Ericson Smith <eric@did-it.com>
Cc: Postgresql General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-02-25T00:46:17Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On 24 Feb 2003, Ericson Smith wrote: > > > From 7.3 to 7.4 the biggest changes planned so far: > > - windows native support <-- gartner gives it a 90% chance of making it > > into the main disto... :-) > > - fix for in() performance issue <-- already in CVS tip > > - partitioning or tablespaces <-- who know? seriously, who? > > - vacuum will be able to compact out unused space <-- Tom Lane > > Will we be able to run the new vacuum system without locking the tables? Vacuum only locks the tables now for a second or so. You might want to look at using regular vacuums more often. In my testing, vacuum (non full) uses <2% of the CPU on a heavily loaded server. Between the low load of vacuum and having higher fsm settings, you might obviate the need to regular vacuum any more than once a day or week or whatever.