Re: RE : full featured alter table?

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 06:55:36PM +0200, Bruno BAGUETTE wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > 
> > > The one thing we don't have that I think would be useful is a 
> > > way to re-order the columns in a table. Maybe it's just me, 
> > > but I tend to want column to appear in a specific order, and 
> > > the only way you can accomplish this today is by re-creating 
> > > the entire table.
> > 
> > I agree with Jim, this would be a 'cool but not mandatory' feature ! :-)
> > 
> > This feature is not mandatory since I avoid the use SELECT * FROM...
> > (and I forbid the use of SELECT * to my subordinates).
>  
> 99.999% of the time, if you put SELECT * into code, you should be strung
> up by your own entrails. But do you mean to tell me that when you're
> testing stuff on the command line you never, ever use SELECT *?

I wouldn't go that far.  I build updatable views, select * from them, 
cycle through the fields getting name / type and build generic forms to 
let the user edit / insert new records.

It allows me to reuse the same basic chunk of code over and over.

Of course, it's select * on a view, not a table, so I set the order when I 
create the view.

Now, using select * and ASSUMING the order of the variables in your 
application code is a punishable offense, but as long as you determine the 
name / type of the fields after the select * it's not so bad.