Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.
scott.marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
From: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
To: Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers@empires.org>
Cc: Antti Haapala <antti.haapala@iki.fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-10-11T21:14:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Jeff Davis wrote: > > They also state that they have more sophisticated ALTER TABLE... > > > > Only usable feature in their ALTER TABLE that doesn't (yet) exist in > > PostgreSQL was changing column order (ok, the order by in table creation > > could be nice), and that's still almost purely cosmetic. Anyway, I could > > have used that command yesterday. Could this be added to pgsql. > > > > I agree with your message except for that statement. MySQL alter table > provides the ability to change column types and cast the records > automatically. I remember that feature as really the only thing from MySQL > that I've ever missed. > > Of course, it's not that wonderful in theory. During development you can > easily drop/recreate the tables and reload the test data; during production > you don't change the data types of your attributes. > > But in practice, during development it's handy sometimes. I still remember a post from somebody on the phpbuilder site that had changed a field from varchar to date and all the dates he had got changed to 0000-00-00. He most unimpressed, especially since he (being typical of a lot of MySQL users) didn't have a backup.