Re: Different Port for PostgreSQL?
Yury Bokhoncovich <byg@center-f1.ru>
From: Yury Bokhoncovich <byg@center-f1.ru>
To: Dan Ostrowski <dan@triad-dev.com>
Cc: "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>, dan radom <dan@radom.org>, <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-09-24T14:50:30Z
Lists: pgsql-general
Hello! On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Dan Ostrowski wrote: > Yes, and I replied to him. I will try to pump them to get the extra firewall > machine, but I am not sure if they will go for it. running PostgreSQL on > the firewall machine is NOT my preferred measure for sure. > > But yes, that was a silly question to ask in retrospect. I will just pipe > ONLY source IPs from the webhost to the DB. Easily done. Sorry. Sometimes > you get a brain lock and you have to ask a dumb question to realize what you > are thinking of wrong. BTW, there's a cool trick: make use UNIX socket, turn off TCP port at all. This solution is quite good for those popular solution "all-in-one" where httpd and DBMS will reside on the same computer and has faster performance (proven). Drawback: you cannot do pg_dump. -- WBR, Yury Bokhoncovich, Senior System Administrator, NOC of F1 Group. Phone: +7 (3832) 106228, ext.140, E-mail: byg@center-f1.ru. Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.